I Guarantee a 24 Hour Response

PUT ME TO THE TEST
By Paul Benson February 1, 2026
Why Is It Crucial To Reach Out To A Lawyer Soon After An Accident? Contacting a lawyer promptly after an accident is vital to preserve crucial evidence from the accident scene. Evidence like skid marks, surveillance videos, and witness statements can disappear quickly. By involving a lawyer early on, you ensure that all necessary evidence is collected and preserved, which can significantly impact the outcome of your case. Why Do Some People Delay Contacting A Lawyer After An Accident? Many individuals delay contacting a lawyer due to the misconception that they are not "lawsuit people." However, when faced with insurance companies refusing to compensate them fairly, they realize the need to protect their rights. By waiting to involve a lawyer, important evidence may be lost, such as video footage or witness accounts, which can weaken their case significantly. What Are The Potential Problems Individuals Face When Insurance Adjusters Reach Out Early? Insurance adjusters often aim to elicit statements that downplay the severity of injuries or shift blame away from their policyholders. By recording conversations and obtaining seemingly innocuous statements, they can later use discrepancies to undermine a claim. Consulting with a lawyer before engaging with insurance adjusters is crucial to avoid inadvertently harming your case. What Key Evidence Can Be Lost If Individuals Wait Too Long After An Accident To Seek Legal Counsel? Delaying legal representation can result in the loss of crucial evidence such as video footage, debris placement at the scene, and witness recollections. Additionally, timely medical documentation is essential for accurately assessing and documenting injuries. Without early involvement, individuals risk missing out on vital evidence that could strengthen their case. How Does The Timing Of Medical Bills And Documentation Impact An Insurance Company's Evaluation Of A Claim? In Wisconsin, the timing of medical bills and documentation is critical due to the collateral source rule. Health insurance coverage may pay medical bills upfront, but individuals can still recover the full amount from the at-fault party's insurance. However, delays or discrepancies in submitting bills can lead to reduced compensation and financial risks for the injured party. What Tactics Do Insurance Companies Employ To Settle Claims Quickly Without Individuals Fully Understanding The Implications? Insurance companies may use tactics like sending blank medical releases or offering immediate settlement checks to expedite claim resolutions. Individuals may unknowingly sign away their rights or settle their claims prematurely, leading to potential long-term repercussions. It is essential to seek legal guidance to navigate these tactics and ensure fair compensation for injuries. What Steps Should Individuals Take After A Minor Accident To Protect Their Legal Rights? After a minor accident, individuals should document the scene thoroughly, report the incident to their insurance company, and consider seeking a legal consultation. It is crucial to accurately relay their version of events to the police, report any injuries promptly, and consult with a lawyer to understand their rights and potential legal options. Is It Advisable For Individuals To Seek Medical Evaluation After A Minor Accident Even If They Feel Only Minor Discomfort? Yes, it is recommended for individuals to undergo a medical evaluation after a minor accident, even if they experience minor discomfort. Prompt medical assessment can uncover hidden injuries that may worsen over time if left untreated. By seeking timely medical attention, individuals protect their health and establish a documented record of injuries for potential legal claims. What Are Some Early Moves Insurance Companies Make That Individuals Should Be Cautious About Following An Accident? Insurance companies may attempt to obtain blanket medical releases or offer immediate settlement checks to expedite claims processing. These tactics can lead to individuals inadvertently signing away their rights or settling for inadequate compensation. It is crucial to seek legal guidance to navigate such tactics and protect one's legal rights effectively.
By Paul Benson November 14, 2025
Understanding Bicycle Accident Laws in Wisconsin: Rights, Liability, and What Cyclists Should Know
By Paul Benson November 14, 2025
Insurance Bad Faith in Wisconsin: What to Do When Your Insurance Company Treats You Unfairly
By Paul Benson November 12, 2025
Slip and Fall Accidents in Wisconsin: What Property Owners Are Really Responsible For
By Paul Benson November 12, 2025
What Really Happens After a Car Crash in Wisconsin: How to Protect Yourself and Your Rights
By Paul Benson November 12, 2025
Understanding Wisconsin’s Direct Action Statute: Who You’re Really Suing After an Accident
Show More
A person is petting a brown dog with their hand.

What Does “Strict Liability” Mean in a Dog Bite Case?

Unlike some states, Wisconsin doesn’t give a dog and its owner a free ride when it comes to the dog’s first biting incident. Other states implement what is known as the “first bite” or “one bite” rule, basically forgiving the dog and its owner for the first offense.


Not so in Wisconsin. “Strict liability” is the rule in the Badger State. A dog’s first bite makes the owner strictly liable for the victim’s medical expenses and other damages, and they are also subject to state and local fines.


If you or a loved one has been injured by a dog — whether by bite or another form of attack — and you’re in the Janesville, Beloit, or Rock County areas of Wisconsin, contact me at The Paul Benson Law Firm to get help with your claim and pursuit of just compensation. I will consult with you for free and provide vigorous and compassionate representation if you choose to proceed with your claim.

Wisconsin Dog Bite Laws, Damages, and Penalties

Wisconsin Statutes Section 174.02 (01) (a) states that “the owner of a dog is liable for the full amount of damages caused by the dog injuring or causing injury to a person, domestic animal or property.” There is no exception for a first-time incident. Note also that the section uses the generic term “injury,” which means that even if a dog merely jumps on you and knocks you over, causing an injury, the owner may be held liable.


“Full amount” is doubled if the dog is involved in a second incident and bites “a person with sufficient force to break the skin and cause permanent physical scarring or disfigurement if the owner was notified or knew that the dog had previously, without provocation, bitten a person with sufficient force to break the skin and cause permanent physical scarring or disfigurement.”


The section also calls for a civil fine of not less than $50 or more than $2,500 if a dog causes a personal injury. For a second offense, the fine rises to not less than $200 nor more than $5,000. The victim or victim’s parents — or the state or any municipality — may also request a court order to have the dog euthanized if it has been involved in two or more incidents of applying “sufficient force.”

Recovery of Damages

Owners of dogs will most likely be covered by their homeowners’ or renters’ policies, which provide liability protection for dog incidents. So, if you or your child is bitten by a neighbor’s pet, you can avoid the messiness and after-effects of suing your neighbor by going through their insurance company. Insurance companies, however, are notorious for having their adjusters try to low ball, deny or extend your claim for so long that the statute of limitations runs out.


One tactic used by the insurance adjusters will be to try to get you to say something that will put you partially at fault for the dog biting incident. This can be done under Wisconsin’s comparative negligence standard — or the “51% Rule.”


If you somehow provoked the dog into the attack or failed to use reasonable caution, the adjusters can try to place part of the blame on you. For example, if they can show you were 20% at fault, the “full amount of damages” will be reduced by 20%. If you can be shown to have been 51% or more at fault, your claim will be denied. The same standard will be applied if you go to court in a personal injury lawsuit.


This may sound incredible, but it has happened: Insurance companies will sometimes attempt to low-ball you for three full years until the statute of limitations for filing a personal injury claim or lawsuit runs out. Then you’ll have to accept the low-ball settlement offer or lose everything. Of course, if they're doing this, you should seek legal representation and perhaps consider the option of taking the whole issue to court through a personal injury lawsuit.

How a Skilled Attorney Can Help

Probably the last thing you want to do if you or a loved one has been injured by a dog is to attempt to go up against insurance adjusters by yourself. As mentioned, they’ll do everything they can to get your compensation reduced or denied — or strung out for so long that you give up and accept a ridiculously low offer. Plus, if you’re recovering from injuries, dealing with adjusters will only aggravate your suffering. You don’t need that.


That’s where I come in. Let me handle the insurance adjusters while you or your loved one recovers. I know the letter of the law and will apply it to your case to help you pursue the “full amount of damages.” I also will be able to obtain leverage through the threat of a personal injury lawsuit, and if all else fails, we can indeed pursue the legal option of going to court.


If you’re in or around Janesville or Beloit, Wisconsin, contact me immediately at The Paul Benson Law Firm for a free consultation to discuss your case claim for dog attack injuries or damages.